vasily
3ef2c5cc31
Claim-bound online verification observations with URL provenance, exact answer-basis references for citation-free governing-rule answers, and an explicit operator identity handoff before source transfer. Bounds resumed work by learning unit and refreshes pack manifest/contracts.
14 lines
2.0 KiB
Markdown
14 lines
2.0 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
name: kb-query
|
|
description: Search and explain accepted GEWU knowledge within an explicit project scope, preserving citations, freshness and uncertainty in a bounded answer.
|
|
---
|
|
# Query accepted knowledge
|
|
|
|
Read the pack's [evidence](../../protocols/EVIDENCE.md) and [scope](../../protocols/SCOPE.md) protocols, then use the [query pipeline](../../pipelines/query.md). Consult [contributions](../../protocols/CONTRIBUTIONS.md) for connection/availability rules and [online verification](../../protocols/ONLINE_VERIFICATION.md) when a fresh check is requested; report stored checks distinctly from unpersisted observations.
|
|
|
|
Establish the question, scope and response budget. For ordinary bounded retrieval, set `include_evidence=false`: search returns compact claim summaries with per-claim `evidence_count` and omits quote payloads. For the strongest results, call the canonical node read to get the complete claim-to-citation groups and inspect the source passages. Set `include_evidence=true` when a full citation-bearing search response is needed and the budget permits it; this is also the API default for compatibility. Use `list_sources` to browse the archived source catalog within that same authorized scope. Narrow searches with node-type or past-freshness filters when they match the question; filters do not widen authorization scope. Preserve complete citation groups and required warnings in the final answer. Widen scope only through an explicit request consistent with the user's task.
|
|
|
|
Separate accepted relationships from suggestions and distinguish disagreement from missing evidence. Answer with relevant conditions, as-of dates and source references near the claim. If retrieval is degraded, index-lagged or insufficient, state the observed limitation. Do not present a local draft, model recollection or unavailable service as an accepted GEWU result.
|
|
|
|
The result is a cited answer or a precise evidence gap, with resolved scope and omissions. If the user later requests capture or correction, route that separate work to the corresponding contribution skill.
|