feat(agent): add online verification and governing-answer citations
Claim-bound online verification observations with URL provenance, exact answer-basis references for citation-free governing-rule answers, and an explicit operator identity handoff before source transfer. Bounds resumed work by learning unit and refreshes pack manifest/contracts.
This commit is contained in:
1 parent
bf268f3c5a
commit
3ef2c5cc31
19 files changed
+374
-55
No files matched your search
@@ -6,6 +6,8 @@ description: Audit a scoped GEWU collection for stale claims, duplicate candidat
|
||||
|
||||
Read the pack's [evidence](../../protocols/EVIDENCE.md), [scope](../../protocols/SCOPE.md) and [contribution](../../protocols/CONTRIBUTIONS.md) protocols, then use the [curation pipeline](../../pipelines/curate.md).
|
||||
|
||||
When online verification is enabled and a claim's references are stale or disputed, follow the shared [online verification protocol](../../protocols/ONLINE_VERIFICATION.md) and preserve check history through the existing update workflow.
|
||||
|
||||
Identify the requested audit and bound its collection/budget. For a report-only request, do not submit proposals. Inspect candidate nodes, source revisions, dates and relationships before recommending a change. Similarity nominates candidates; it does not prove duplicates. Preserve incompatible claims and explain the conditions under which they differ.
|
||||
|
||||
For requested corrections, submit typed stale flags, supersession or relationship proposals supported by inspected records. Record material assumptions and limitations as distinct evidence-backed claim groups on the relevant node; do not infer them from an approach summary or relationship condition. Merges, promotion and protected changes follow their separate policy/owner gates. Never silently delete a node, rewrite canonical files or treat read scope as change authority.
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in new issue
Block a user