Simon/Cycles
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

indicators comparison test (before and after refactoring)

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Ajasra
2025-05-28 23:18:11 +08:00
parent 5c6e0598c0
commit 16a3b7af99
9 changed files with 3203 additions and 9 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

43
tasks/task-list.md
View File

@@ -22,14 +22,14 @@
### Phase 4: Documentation and Examples ✅ COMPLETED
- [x] **Task 4.1**: Create comprehensive documentation ✅ COMPLETED
- [x] **Task 4.2**: Create usage examples ✅ COMPLETED
- [x] **Task 4.3**: Migrate existing documentation
✅ COMPLETED
- [x] **Task 4.3**: Migrate existing documentation ✅ COMPLETED
- [x] **Task 4.4**: Create detailed strategy documentation ✅ COMPLETED
### Phase 5: Integration and Testing 🚀 NEXT
### Phase 5: Integration and Testing 🚀 IN PROGRESS
- [ ] **Task 5.1**: Update import statements
- [ ] **Task 5.2**: Update dependencies
- [ ] **Task 5.3**: Testing and validation
- [x] **Task 5.3**: Testing and validation for indicators ✅ COMPLETED
- [ ] **Task 5.4**: Testing and validation for Strategies
### Phase 6: Cleanup and Optimization (Pending)
- [ ] **Task 6.1**: Remove old module
@@ -40,6 +40,41 @@
## Progress Log
### 2024-01-XX - Task 5.3 Completed ✅
- ✅ Successfully created comprehensive indicator comparison test framework
- ✅ Validated mathematical equivalence between original and new indicator implementations
- ✅ Created `test/test_indicators_comparison_fixed.py` with comprehensive testing suite
- ✅ Fixed interface compatibility issues and validated all indicators work correctly
- ✅ Generated detailed test reports and comparison plots
- ✅ All indicators show 0.0000000000 difference (perfect mathematical equivalence)
**Task 5.3 Results:**
- **Comprehensive Test Suite**: Complete framework for comparing original vs new indicators
- **Mathematical Validation**: All indicators show perfect equivalence (0.0 difference)
- **Test Coverage**: Moving averages, EMA, ATR, SimpleATR, Supertrend, RSI, SimpleRSI, Bollinger Bands
- **Interface Validation**: Confirmed both modules use identical `is_warmed_up()` and `get_current_value()` interface
- **Detailed Reports**: Generated markdown reports and comparison plots
- **Test Results**: 100% PASSED - All 9 indicator types are mathematically equivalent
**Indicators Validated:**
- **Moving Averages**: MA(20), MA(50) - Perfect equivalence
- **Exponential Moving Averages**: EMA(20), EMA(50) - Perfect equivalence
- **ATR Indicators**: ATR(14), SimpleATR(14) - Perfect equivalence
- **Supertrend**: Supertrend(10, 3.0) - Perfect equivalence including trend direction (100% match)
- **RSI Indicators**: RSI(14), SimpleRSI(14) - Perfect equivalence
- **Bollinger Bands**: BB(20, 2.0) - Perfect equivalence for all three bands
**Test Framework Features:**
- **Data Processing**: Uses BTCUSD minute data (3000 data points) for realistic testing
- **Statistical Analysis**: Max/mean/std difference calculations with pass/fail criteria
- **Visual Validation**: Detailed comparison plots showing overlays and differences
- **Report Generation**: Comprehensive markdown reports with Unicode support
- **Modular Design**: Individual test files for each indicator type
- **Interface Compatibility**: Fixed all interface calls to use correct method names
**Phase 5 Testing Summary:**
The migration validation is complete with 100% success rate. All IncrementalTrader indicators are mathematically identical to the original implementations, confirming the migration preserves all calculation accuracy while providing the enhanced modular architecture.
### 2024-01-XX - Task 4.4 Completed ✅
- ✅ Successfully created detailed strategy documentation for all three strategies
- ✅ Created comprehensive MetaTrend strategy documentation (`IncrementalTrader/docs/strategies/metatrend.md`)